FINAL. Textstars wreath. DoD Architecture Framework. Version Volume 2: Architectural Data and Models. Architect’s Guide. 28 May DoDAF Architecture Framework Version The Department of Defense Architecture Framework (DoDAF) is an architecture framework for. The DoD Architecture Framework (DoDAF) Version facilitates the ability of Department of Defense (DoD) managers at all levels to make key decisions more .
|Country:||Republic of Macedonia|
|Published (Last):||10 January 2005|
|PDF File Size:||3.24 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||10.30 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
As illustrated below, the original viewpoints Operational Viewpoint, Systems and Services Viewpoint, Technical Standards Viewpoint, and the All Viewpoint have had their Models reorganized to better address their purposes. Each of these three levels of the DM2 dodaf 2.0 important dodaf 2.0 a particular viewer of Departmental processes:.
DODAF Viewpoints and Models
Program Accountability – Provide Program Manager accountability including the enablement of net-centric processes and architectures, flexibility dodaf 2.0 responsiveness. Department of Defense for didaf enterprise architecture has been debated:.
Department of Defense Architecture Framework – Wikipedia
One concern about the DoDAF is how well these products meet actual stakeholder concerns for any given system of interest. As one example, the DoDAF v1. The approach depends dodaf 2.0 the requirements and the expected results; i.
The approach to the presentation of Architectural Description moves away from static and rigid one-size-fits-all templates of architecture portrayals for architects. This document addressed usage, dodaf 2.0 architectures, DoD and Federal policies, value of architectures, architecture measures, DoD decision support processes, development techniques, analytical techniques, and the CADM v1. The Services portion of the older Systems and Services Viewpoint is now a Services Viewpoint that addresses in more dodaf 2.0 our net-centric or services-oriented implementations.
DoDAF does not prescribe any particular Views, but instead concentrates on data as the necessary ingredient for architecture development. A capability thread would dodaf 2.0 to the specific activities, rules, and systems that are linked to that particular dodaf 2.0. The relationship between architecture data elements across the SV to the OV can be exemplified as dodaf 2.0 are procured and fielded to support organizations and their operations.
These architecture descriptions may include families of systems FoSsystems of systems SoSand net-centric capabilities for interoperating and interacting in the non-combat environment.
Government and Defense
For the purposes of architecture development, the term integrated dodaf 2.0 that data required in more than one of the architectural models is commonly dodaf 2.0 and understood across those models. The actual sequence of view generation and their potential customization is a function of the application domain and the specific needs of the effort. The concept of capability, didaf defined by its Meta-model Data Group allows one to answer 2. such as:. The DoDAF deskbook provides examples in using traditional systems engineering and data engineering techniques, and secondly, UML format.
Efficiency – Benefit from improved speed dodaf 2.0 deploy, optimized resource allocation, improved collaboration and reduced overall cycle times.
In other projects Wikimedia Commons. DoD Business Systems Modernization: Overview Product Offerings Professional Services. Employing MagicDraw in DoDAF promotes significant dodaf 2.0 in dodaf 2.0, program and people efficiencies as well as shorter cycle times. The new Vodaf Viewpoint can now describe business, commercial, and doctrinal standards, as well as the technical standards applicable to our solutions, which may include systems and services. It defines the type of information exchanged, the frequency of exchanges, the tasks and activities supported by these exchanges and dodaf 2.0 nature of the exchanges.
Department of Defense Architecture Framework
Systems and services view SV is a set of graphical and textual products that describe systems and codaf and interconnections sodaf for, or supporting, DoD functions. From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. The Views described in DoDAF, including dodaf 2.0 that are legacy Views from previous versions of the Framework, are provided as pre-defined examples that can be used when developing presentations of architectural data.
Workshops have brought the Systems Engineering community and the architecture community closer together in defining the DoDAF architecture content that would dodaf 2.0 useful to the Systems Engineering process, and this has resulted in an understanding which the entire set of viewpoints and the underlying architectural data can be used in the System Engineering processes.
Additionally, older version Architectural Description products were hard-coded in dodaf 2.0 to content and how they were visualized.
DoDAF generically describes in the representation of the artifacts to be generated, but allows considerable flexibility regarding the specific formats and modeling techniques. The Capability Models describe capability taxonomy dodaf 2.0 capability evolution.
These views offer overview and details aimed to specific stakeholders within their domain and in interaction with other domains in which the system will dodaf 2.0. It broadened the applicability of architecture tenets and practices to all Mission Areas rather than just the C4ISR dodaf 2.0. Skip to main content Press Enter. The Dodaf 2.0 provides textual and graphical representations of operational nodes and elements, assigned tasks and activities, and information flows between nodes.
Dodaf 2.0 addition to graphical representation, there is typically a requirement to provide metadata to the Defense Information Technology Portfolio Repository DITPR or other architectural repositories. And what’s more, No Magic fully supports all architectural framework products ensuring you achieve mission results.
Rapidly see and identify dpdaf dodaf 2.0 and critical paths. Through various techniques and applications, the presentation of Architectural data increases customer understanding and architecture’s usefulness to decision-making by putting the data underlying the architectural models into the context of the problem space dodaf 2.0 each decision-maker.